The documentation lists support for Ubuntu.   However, notice there are cavetas.  32-bit only, certain versions, required Java versions, etc.   You will need to have some controls and understanding of the Linux system in order to enforce any kind of "supported platform" standards.   If you have a supported Ubuntu release and working Java, what happens when a user logs in and clicks the "Start" button for Network Connect?  It's supposed to work.   If not, there are some KB articles (google for:  junpier network connect linux site:kb.pulsesecure.net) that should help you troubleshoot what may be going on. ... View more

It's not "locked" -- the lock icon is just the icon that Network Connect uses.  On the far right you can click the "Download" link.   ... View more

A modest proposal -- after 2 years of this this thread being active, could a mod rename it to fix the spelling error?   Google/Bing searches will turn up better results if the thread is called "Android Support" rather than "Andorid Support." ... View more

@muttbarker wrote: There is no advantage to an SA over a MAG unless you need to run old code. I thought I remembered seeing at one point that the MAG didn't support IVS. Is this still the case, or has it been corrected in newer software releases? ... View more

@[email protected] wrote: That was with lion using uagent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7) AppleWebKit/534.48.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.48.3_ That's the default Safari 5.0 user-agent string, I believe. You could try something older and more widely compatible like Firefox 4. It may also be looking for the OS string, where it says "Intel Mac OS X 10_7," you can manually remove that part from the UA string or set it to an older version of OS X by setting "Other" in the Safari -> Develop -> User Agent menu and see if that works. ... View more

As a possible workaround (and I haven't tested this)... you could try setting a different User Agent string in Safari. I highly doubt this is an "Apple problem" -- this is most likely just a case of the SA device [naively] checking for specific environment strings. Again, this is just my conjecture. To test it... under Preferences in Safari, click Advanced and enable the check box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar" Then, when you visit the SA login page, click the Develop menu, then "User Agent", then choose a different User Agent string, such as Safari 5.0.6, Firefox, or even Internet Explorer. It's not ideal, but it might get your users by until a fix comes from Juniper. ... View more

The Junos image that you see is for the CM060, which is the chassis management module for the 6610 and 6611 models. The CM060 doesn't actually run the IVE or UAC software. The SM160 and SM360 modules are what run the IVE or UAC images. The 2600 and 4610 don't have modules, so they just load the IVE or UAC images. ... View more

@moinul wrote: <...> MAG platforms has 100% SSL and UAC feature parity - can be utilized for all existing services. Can Juniper really claim 100% parity? From what I've read, the MAG does not support IVS at this time, therefore it cannot be utilized for all existing services, considering "all existing services" in many customers' cases includes the use of IVS. ... View more

These 3 KB articles may help you troubleshoot the issue, as well as outline what is and is not supported currently with the IVE and SharePoint 2010: [kb20085] - [SSL VPN] Supported features and functionality of SharePoint 2010 when accessed using Secure Access SSL VPN's Web/Rewrite access method [kb19908] - [SSL VPN] Configuration of PassThrough Proxy (PTP) based access method for Microsoft SharePoint 2003, SharePoint 2007 and SharePoint 2010 resources [kb11501] - [SSL VPN] Known Issues and limitations when accessing Microsoft SharePoint 2003 / 2007 / 2010 resources via the Web Rewrite Access mechanism ... View more

These 3 KB articles may help you troubleshoot the issue, as well as outline what is and is not supported currently with the IVE and SharePoint 2010: [kb20085] - [SSL VPN] Supported features and functionality of SharePoint 2010 when accessed using Secure Access SSL VPN's Web/Rewrite access method [kb19908] - [SSL VPN] Configuration of PassThrough Proxy (PTP) based access method for Microsoft SharePoint 2003, SharePoint 2007 and SharePoint 2010 resources [kb11501] - [SSL VPN] Known Issues and limitations when accessing Microsoft SharePoint 2003 / 2007 / 2010 resources via the Web Rewrite Access mechanism ... View more

@muttbarker wrote: FYI - I have talked to an SE who says that factory-default still will not allow you change the personality. He has one of the new small units. So, what is the factory default personality then? The data sheets show ordering information for SKUs that simply list that the MAG2600 is for SSL VPN and Guest Access, the 4610/6610/6611 all say "for SSL VPN or NAC users." So, if you can only get it with one personality, which is it, and how do you differentiate which personality you're ordering? @muttbarker wrote: As for feature parity - I am a reseller - I have customers saying to me "hey - what's up with the new box?" My answer to them is "I don't have a clue" -- nor do the SE's at this point in time. I thought Juniper had learned their lessons with the SRX debacle. Here we have another product that doesn't seem to be fully baked, and even the SEs don't know what it does? How do they expect to sell these things if even the Juniper SEs can't tell you what they do? @muttbarker wrote: I think Juniper did a poor job of releasing this product in terms of educating their business partners. ... AND educating potential customers. "Here's our new device! It's awesome!" -- "Great, but what does it DO?" "It's awesome! You should buy it!" ... View more

The product pages really suffer from poor marketing / communication. I wish Juniper would dedicate some more resources to better communicating what a product actually *DOES* in their product pages. The fact that it's unclear what the MAG devices really do is a perfect example of this. My take on the MAG devices, and someone please correct me if I'm wrong (or better yet, write a better product page, hehehe) is that they are the next evolutionary step of both the SA and IC/UAC appliances combined into one appliance. I would be very curious to know if they will have feature parity across those platforms, though. For example, will the SSL-VPN capabilities be the same as the SA appliances, or will certain things be lacking or better on the MAG? ... View more

The recommended release is still 6.5. I've noticed that Juniper is often slow when it comes to getting their recommended release in-line with the latest code trains. 7.0 is now at R4, so I would think it's mostly stable by now. What I usually recommend is that if there is a feature in 7.0 that you really need, then you will probably be OK since like I said, they're up to R4 now. However, if you don't need any of the shiny-fancy-whiz-bang stuff in 7.0, it's usually best to stick with the recommended release. I'm running 6.5 in production on a HA pair of SA-4500s, and I have a testing environment running 7.0. ... View more

Have you looked into Splunk or Zenoss? -kr --- If this solves your problem, please mark this post as "Accepted Solution." Kudos are always appreciated. ... View more