- Pulse Secure Community
- :
- About Mevunky_
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
since
10-29-2017
10-29-2017
Mevunky_
Occasional Contributor
14
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
05-24-2015
09:59:PM
When you say working on a Pulse cleint, does this mean a new Linux client with support for modern operating systems? Is this a ground up client which presents the same feature set (full VPN tunnel) as on Windows/Mac/Mobile for 64bit Linux?
... View more
05-24-2015
09:35:PM
We are requesting exactly the same thing. Demand for this is extremely high, please add us to the list of requesters. Our open ticket about the issue: Ticket: SR Update P3 2015-0414-0938 - NIWA LIMITED. Any real ETA? As it seems this has been in the pipeline for years but we never see anything...
... View more
05-27-2012
09:38:PM
Still no fix for this issue on 7.1R9 yet?
... View more
05-14-2012
06:40:PM
I have been doing exactly the same with the DMG, works just fine.
... View more
05-14-2012
03:17:PM
Could you please let us know the outcome of this and or if they provide you with updated firmware/a fix. Thanks!
... View more
05-13-2012
06:51:PM
Would also like to know if there is a fix, exactly the same issue here on 10.7.3 and 10.7.4 after the upgrade to R9.
... View more
08-09-2011
08:56:PM
Will do, however I do find it very hard to fathon that they are not already supported and that many members of the community have not requested this as a feature already.
... View more
08-08-2011
04:56:PM
Hi all, I have done a quick search only to find the Linux 64bit feature request and or questions regarding it have never really been answered. Surely a 64bit NC or Pulse app is on the cards for Linux? Support under SLES, SLED, RH and Ubuntu 64 are sorely needed!
... View more
03-03-2011
03:03:PM
Exiting NC after failover does not help sadly, have tried that a few times in the past. As for NCP and ESP transport modes...they don't seem to have any effect on failover or NC working on the second concentrator. I think I am now at the point where I should probably just open a ticket and see what Juniper support think directly. Will update this thread on how that works out.
... View more
03-02-2011
02:27:PM
Ive now had time to get around to connecting to the second concentrator and also running some quick packet dumps on every stage of the network I have confirmed the following. Client connects correctly to NC on the second concentrator and all looks well. Compression is LZO in this case and transport is ESP. Packets leave the NC client and do reach all subnets on our network without issue. Servers reply correctly to ICMP and direct them back to the NC client. Packets reach the cluster using the TCP dump on the Juniper and inspecting with wireshark. The dumps look good to me and nothing out of the ordinary, however the packets are never delivered to the NC client. The NC client can ping the NC gateway without trouble but this is the only packet responce you can initiate in a two way fashion. This leads me to believe ive either misconfigured the second concentrator or there is something else a miss between the two. Any ideas apreciated.
... View more
03-01-2011
12:28:PM
The internal network routes all point to the cluster VIP correctly not either of the nodes so I do not think this is the issue. I will try connect to the IP and see how it goes.
... View more
02-28-2011
05:22:PM
The problem by doing that is that I cannot connect directly to it as once it is taken out of the cluster it has no NC license. And I don't see how I can connect to the passive unit while it is in the cluster since it isnt active.
... View more
02-27-2011
12:40:PM
The biggest problem is that I cannot fail over the cluster currently due to the effect on the users which makes testing extremely hard, so I am thinking of getting a temporary license from Juniper support for the second unit and performing some dumps etc. The directly connected switch is a Cisco 2960/12.2(40) so it could possibly be an ARP related issue but as above I think I should probably just open a ticket so I can troubleshoot the issue without consequesce.
... View more
02-24-2011
04:41:PM
I am currently making use of two SA2000 units in a failover cluster (active passive). The units work wonderfully until I try to failover the cluster to the secondary unit. Firmware is 7.0R4 (build 17289). Once the second unit takes over any NC clients who connect cannot access any of our subnets bar one, the concentrators are plugged into the same switch. I have triple checked all the setups but I cannot find any problems that I know of. I cannot easily test and play with the second unit because it obviously effects my clients quite badly and if I take it out of the cluster it has no network connect license for stand alone use. Where would be the best place to start looking to track down this problem.
... View more
Latest Tags
No tags yet
© 2017 Pulse Secure, LLC. Use of this website assumes acceptance of our Legal Notices and Privacy Policy.
Pulse Secure has updated its Privacy Policy effective June 28, 2017.
