- Pulse Secure Community
- :
- About krap_rz
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
since
11-29-2012
10-30-2017
krap_rz
Occasional Contributor
17
Posts
0
Kudos
0
Solutions
03-27-2015
09:54:PM
Have you take a step back and relook the network level setup? If the source of attack from certain network address perhaps firewall can blocked it. If its random, try to look into users-agent or try to implement https (ssl to steelapp, http to backend).
... View more
03-23-2015
05:34:AM
Hi there though I'm not sure why it's related to Steelapp but stacking c3650 you would need 2 cab-stack-50cm. Though 1 is enough, but since you need 2 stacking interface module, the stack cable 50cm comes 'free'.Thx
... View more
03-22-2015
09:35:AM
owh...just to update. i have also deployed policy based routing, which if a device in eth2 segments needs to talk to device in eth3 segments, the will be force to cross over a firewall. My PBR are any source .2.x, go to .2.254, and use eth2 any source .3.x, go to .3.254, and use eth3 "My intention" example 1) Device(.2.1) <-->firewall(.2.254)<-->TIP SvcLAN (.3.100)<-->ServerLAN(3.1) 2) Device(.3.1) <-->firewall(.3.254)<-->TIP SvcDMZ (.2.200)<-->ServerDMZ(2.1) "Real result" that im getting is 1) Device(.2.1) <-->TIP SvcLAN (.3.100)<-->ServerLAN(3.1) 2) Device(.3.1) <-->TIP SvcDMZ (.2.200)<-->ServerDMZ(2.1) service failed to access, but ping and traceroute success
... View more
03-21-2015
10:04:PM
Hi all Have anyone encounter arp flux issues? (Different nic respond ping/traceroute to TIP or Int IP of another nic) Currently I'm running Steelapp v9.8r2, in a cluster, 3 interfaces with one-arm deployment on each nics. So what happen is, a server 10.x.3.1,from eth3 side tries to ping/tracerote/connect TIP (10.x.2.200) or Int IP (10.x.2.254) in eth2, . Both ping and traceroute is succesful, but traceroute shows only one hop (rather than as suppose 2hops). Reading from other linux issues was due to Sysctl arp flux in which other forum propose 2 Sysctl lines to be added; net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore=1 net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce=2 So before going for open a tac or check, i would like to know if other fellow Steelapp users encounter the same issues. Your responce is highly appreciated.
... View more
12-18-2014
06:40:AM
Thanks. I was thinking of that it will not be an exact replica on my real deployment which most would be more on Esxi. To invest on vmworkstation is possible and i'm using my company notebook. Thus the idea of using virtual box with v9.8... But thanks for the responce
... View more
12-14-2014
08:45:PM
Hi all, For the time being im able to use 9.6 with ubuntu 64bit as the vm machine (using 9.6 vmdk as the disk file). But it would not be possible to use 9.8 and it cannot be upgraded from 9.6 due to limited disk size warning... Appreciate the help received. Looking this as a method for self learning and demo to others
... View more
09-27-2014
03:24:AM
Thanks Nahas confirm this the Steelapp engineer on this. LibDNS.rts is a simple bind but not able to split dns, unless implement with trafficscript to recognise internal and external IP address and response with 2 or more libDNS config
... View more
09-23-2014
11:09:AM
Hi all, i'm pretty much new in the steelapp subject so appreciate the help received. I wanted to know in a parallel deployment of the GLB(STM4k) do i still need the secondary DNS server to be delegated from the main NS? Can STM act as a bind instead? if yes, please advice the methods. thank you
... View more
09-03-2014
07:37:AM
thanks armand, i like the idea and will dig deeper into the back end servers. I do suspect not only net weaver tends to have chatty-type portal but also a pretty slow or large dB. Im guessing the app-dev must setup as default...
... View more
09-03-2014
07:33:AM
Hi David have gone through it, but never mentioned about aptimizer
... View more
08-30-2014
10:10:AM
Hi all, Have anyone tried aptimizer or steelapp with aptimizer for sap netweaver?
... View more
10-30-2012
08:38:PM
ok thanks!!!
... View more
10-29-2012
08:49:PM
how may can a STM2000M and 4000M traffic ip group (VIP) can be created? is there a specific numbers or can there be thousands as long as the license limit is not reach?
... View more
06-27-2012
02:54:AM
Hi Guys, since we are going to use Stingray under cloud service, what would be the best optimum vcore/vram/hdisk space should look into for each STM 500 (L,L2, M & H), 1000M and 2000L
... View more
03-19-2012
12:33:AM
Hi Guys, Are stingray able to work under KVM hypervisory as that is the current enviroment that we have right now. It will take some time for our Company to ventures into Oracle-vm or vmware, so currently looking into the existing enviroment that we have. pls advise.
... View more
Latest Tags
No tags yet
© 2017 Pulse Secure, LLC. Use of this website assumes acceptance of our Legal Notices and Privacy Policy.
Pulse Secure has updated its Privacy Policy effective June 28, 2017.
